“Black Swan” author Nicholas Nassim Taleb once wrote that “intelligence consists in ignoring things that are irrelevant (avoiding false patterns).” Organizations must take this definition to heart as they incorporate Identity Security intelligence – an essential element of any Zero Trust cybersecurity strategy.
Many organizations have dedicated Security Operations Center (SOC) teams responsible for their threat detection, investigation and response efforts. To the layperson, SOC teams often seem like the all-seeing eye of an organization, immediately detecting any bad behavior across infrastructure, applications and endpoints. In reality, though, monitoring for threats, remediating vulnerabilities and executing incident response plans are a ton of work. SOC teams must work across the security organization to collect and analyze the right data and ignore false positives (a.k.a. irrelevant things). In the case of Identity Security, this means analyzing user behavior analytics that enable rapid responses to anomalous or risky privileged access to infrastructure and applications.
The 2022 CyberArk Identity Security Threat Landscape Report reveals that credential access is the most reported risk of all tactics in the MITRE ATT&CK framework. This isn’t exactly shocking. Most cyberattacks take the path of least resistance: compromise an identity by stealing credentials, move laterally and escalate privileges.
Yet despite this understanding, many organizations struggle to apply enhanced threat detection to their most significant source of cybersecurity risk: compromised identities and credentials. To embody Zero Trust and an assume-breach mindset, organizations must improve their ability to respond rapidly to identity-centric attacks.
Why It’s So Difficult to Detect and Remediate Identity-related Threats
To better understand the challenges of detecting and mitigating identity compromise attacks, let’s dive a bit deeper. Organizations face several challenges with identity threat detection and protection, such as:
1. A wide variety of attack methods. The bad guys have lots of effective methods to compromise identities. From phishing, social engineering and credential harvesting to ransomware attacks that aim to compromise local admin accounts on endpoints, attackers have a big arsenal of tactics used to steal credentials and passwords.
It may take time to realize passwords have been stolen. And insider threats pose another significant complication. When employees break bad, they can use their existing, valid credentials. To defend against internal bad actors, organizations need holistic data and context to identify anomalous or high-risk behavior.
2. Internal access control friction. It’s not always easy for Identity Security and SOC teams to get along. Identity Security programs manage access control policies, provisioning entitlements while adhering to audit and compliance requirements like the rule of least privilege. These teams also own authentication and authorization policies that may be designed to address usability requirements from their developer, admin and workforce stakeholders. This can cause more permissive access control policies than the SOC team might design to prioritize risk reduction.
At the same time, SOC teams may need to use administrative accounts outside of their regular responsibilities when remediating security incidents. Without clearly documented incident response plans and policies granting access for automatic remediation, SOC teams can face slower response times.
3. Siloed technologies and processes. Remember the point about ignoring false patterns? It’s important that threat analytics capabilities in privileged access management (PAM) or Identity as a Service (IDaaS) solutions integrate with the tools SOC teams already rely on. Key examples include security information event management (SIEM) and extended detection and response (XDR) solutions. Without the full data that these integrations provide, SOC teams may not be able to see the full picture and could identify false positives.
Even worse, without proper data correlation to generate alerts, Identity Security solutions might not allow SOC teams to see the signal in the noise. Without full context, SOC teams might miss valid patterns that could indicate compromise. For example, an organization with siloed IDaaS and PAM analytics may be able to detect individual low-risk actions like an administrator entering a low-risk command in a privileged session or accessing a web app from an irregular location. In combination, these “low-risk” events may be a strong case for a closer look. But with siloed analytics, SOC and Identity Security teams may not spot the valid pattern.
Threat detection capabilities are only as effective as the data they can analyze. If Identity Security and SOC technologies are not integrated for multi-directional data sharing, SOC teams may face a high number of false positives or worse – a low number of threats detected.
How Can Identity Security Intelligence Streamline Security Ops?
Security is a team game. As with any other security challenge, solving this gap in identity threat detection and prevention requires a combination of people, processes and technology. Here are some recommendations:
1. Document and automate processes for responding to identity-centric attacks. Documented plans in incident response scenarios provide a standardized playbook to help ensure alignment and accountability between SOC and Identity Security teams. And in many cases, documented incident response plans can also help satisfy cyber insurance, audit and compliance requirements.
As a best practice, building clear plans for responding to different types of security incidents (e.g., dedicated actions for remediating a phishing attack) can also streamline response processes, helping minimize the business disruption of security incidents.
2. Centralize threat detection across all user access. Multi-contextual analysis of user access can provide SOC and Identity Security teams with a complete picture of a potential security incident. This data correlation can help accelerate detection and response.
For example, Identity Security Intelligence, a shared service of the CyberArk Identity Security Platform, analyzes a user’s access to web applications and privileged accounts to detect and remediate in-progress attacks. Identity Security Intelligence centrally gathers user behavior analytics data such as login date and time, login location and actions performed by privileged accounts. The service then detects and sends alerts regarding behavior that departs from a user’s behavioral baseline access patterns to web apps and IT infrastructure. The CyberArk Identity Security Platform analyzes a user’s access to web applications and privileged accounts to detect and remediate in-progress attacks. Identity Security Intelligence centrally gathers user behavior analytics data such as login date and time, login location and actions performed of privileged accounts. The service then detects and sends alerts regarding behavior that departs from a user’s behavioral baseline access patterns to web apps and IT infrastructure.
Multi-contextual user behavior analytics in Identity Security Intelligence
Armed with sharper, multi-contextual insight, SOC and Identity Security teams can identify and respond to combinations of behavior that may signal identity compromise, such as an irregular login time, and then entry of specific commands in a remote session to a corporate server.
3. Integrate Identity Security and SOC Team tools. Identity Security teams must arm their SOC teams with the data their solutions naturally detect. Data and alerts from threat analytics services like Identity Security Intelligence can accelerate the SOC team’s ability to detect stolen credentials, insider threats and other identity-centric attacks.
Similarly, SOC teams must configure integrations between their tools and Identity Security solutions to remediate threats. For example, if a SOC team identifies potential abuse of a privileged account used to maintain Windows servers, integration with a PAM solution can automatically suspend or terminate the session. Or in another scenario, if Identity Security Intelligence sends an alert on a risky command entered on a Linux server, security teams can use CyberArk’s identity orchestration capabilities to automatically prevent the employee from using privileged accounts through PAM.
Putting It All Together: The Need for Identity Security Intelligence
Intelligent identity threat detection efforts require a holistic view of user behavior that helps teams spot only the relevant patterns. Identity Security Intelligence can help organizations reduce the risk of identity-centric attacks by eliminating siloes between teams, documenting processes and integrating technologies to rapidly detect and respond to identity-centric threats.
AI agents are forcing a reckoning with identity and control
Most organizations never planned for AI to start making real decisions. They started with simple helpers. An agent answered basic questions or generated small automations so teams could avoid...
Chasing digital ghosts across modern IGA environments
In Pac-Man, ghosts seem pretty easy to dodge. You’re clearing the maze, racking up points, three more pellets away from leveling up. Then, out of nowhere, they close in and cut off all hope of...
Gone are the days when attackers had to break down doors. Now, they just log in with what look like legitimate credentials. This shift in tactics has been underway for a while, but the rapid...
The hidden cost of PKI: Why certificate failures aren’t just an IT problem
For years, businesses have treated public key infrastructure (PKI) as background plumbing, quietly securing access across enterprise systems and devices, and rarely drawing executive attention...
How the future of privilege is reshaping compliance
If privilege has changed, compliance can’t stay static. As organizations accelerate digital transformation, the compliance landscape is shifting beneath their feet—especially when it comes to how...
What’s shaping the AI agent security market in 2026
For the past two years, AI agents have dominated boardroom conversations, product roadmaps, and investor decks. Companies made bold promises, tested early prototypes, and poured resources into...
Beneath the AI iceberg: The forces reshaping work and security
In conversations about AI, there’s a tendency to treat the future like a horizon we’re walking toward, always somewhere ahead, always a question of when. But if we look closely, the forces...
Inside CyberArk Labs: the evolving risks in AI, browsers and OAuth
In 2025, we saw attackers get bolder and smarter, using AI to amplify old tricks and invent new ones. The reality is, innovation cuts both ways. If you have tools, AI is going to make...
In my house, we consume a lot of AI research. We also watch a lot—probably too much—TV. Late in 2025, those worlds collided when the AI giant Anthropic was featured on “60 Minutes.” My husband...
Post-quantum identity security: Moving from risk to readiness
Quantum computing sounds like something straight out of science fiction. It brings to mind images of impossibly powerful machines solving humanity’s biggest problems, from discovering new...
Vibe check your vibe code: Adding human judgment to AI-driven development
Remember when open meant visible? When a bug in open-source code left breadcrumbs you could audit? When you could trace commits, contributors, timestamps, even heated 2:13 a.m. debates on tabs...
The CA/B Forum mandate: a catalyst for modernizing machine identity management
Modernization rarely begins without a catalyst. For organizations managing machine identities, the CA/B Forum mandate is driving a wave of change—transforming compliance pressure into momentum for...
Identity security: The essential foundation for every CISO’s 2026 cybersecurity strategy
When I first joined CyberArk, it wasn’t just about the company or the technology, but a belief. A belief that identity security is the foundation of cybersecurity. Identity security is the...
The future of privilege: Dynamic identity security in real time
Privilege is no longer a static control. It shifts dynamically with every action taken by an increasingly dynamic set of users, workloads, and AI agents, making traditional reliance on static...
How AI agent privileges are redefining cyber insurance expectations
When ransomware drove record losses, insurers began scrutinizing basic controls like multi-factor authentication (MFA), backups, and endpoint detection. Now, AI-driven automation is introducing a...
AI agents and identity risks: How security will shift in 2026
The pace of technological change is relentless. Not long ago, our migration to the cloud and the automation of CI/CD pipelines dominated the conversation. Now, AI agents are reshaping how we think...
TLS certificate management in 2026: The endless game of Whack-A-Cert
As 2025 races to a close, you’ll see several predictions about AI agents, quantum computing, and other frontier innovations. Don’t get me wrong, I’m excited about solving these challenges, too....
Across today’s threat landscape, the divide between cybercrime and cyberwarfare is disappearing. Financially motivated groups and state-sponsored actors rely on the same tactics, techniques, and...
The next chapter of identity security begins with privilege
Privileged access management (PAM) was once thought of in simple terms: secure the credentials of a handful of administrators managing on-premises systems. Vault the passwords, rotate them...
Cybersecurity never stands still. Every login, session, and connection shifts the balance between freedom and control. Effective access management today isn’t about restriction—it’s about enabling...