“Black Swan” author Nicholas Nassim Taleb once wrote that “intelligence consists in ignoring things that are irrelevant (avoiding false patterns).” Organizations must take this definition to heart as they incorporate Identity Security intelligence – an essential element of any Zero Trust cybersecurity strategy.
Many organizations have dedicated Security Operations Center (SOC) teams responsible for their threat detection, investigation and response efforts. To the layperson, SOC teams often seem like the all-seeing eye of an organization, immediately detecting any bad behavior across infrastructure, applications and endpoints. In reality, though, monitoring for threats, remediating vulnerabilities and executing incident response plans are a ton of work. SOC teams must work across the security organization to collect and analyze the right data and ignore false positives (a.k.a. irrelevant things). In the case of Identity Security, this means analyzing user behavior analytics that enable rapid responses to anomalous or risky privileged access to infrastructure and applications.
The 2022 CyberArk Identity Security Threat Landscape Report reveals that credential access is the most reported risk of all tactics in the MITRE ATT&CK framework. This isn’t exactly shocking. Most cyberattacks take the path of least resistance: compromise an identity by stealing credentials, move laterally and escalate privileges.
Yet despite this understanding, many organizations struggle to apply enhanced threat detection to their most significant source of cybersecurity risk: compromised identities and credentials. To embody Zero Trust and an assume-breach mindset, organizations must improve their ability to respond rapidly to identity-centric attacks.
Why It’s So Difficult to Detect and Remediate Identity-related Threats
To better understand the challenges of detecting and mitigating identity compromise attacks, let’s dive a bit deeper. Organizations face several challenges with identity threat detection and protection, such as:
1. A wide variety of attack methods. The bad guys have lots of effective methods to compromise identities. From phishing, social engineering and credential harvesting to ransomware attacks that aim to compromise local admin accounts on endpoints, attackers have a big arsenal of tactics used to steal credentials and passwords.
It may take time to realize passwords have been stolen. And insider threats pose another significant complication. When employees break bad, they can use their existing, valid credentials. To defend against internal bad actors, organizations need holistic data and context to identify anomalous or high-risk behavior.
2. Internal access control friction. It’s not always easy for Identity Security and SOC teams to get along. Identity Security programs manage access control policies, provisioning entitlements while adhering to audit and compliance requirements like the rule of least privilege. These teams also own authentication and authorization policies that may be designed to address usability requirements from their developer, admin and workforce stakeholders. This can cause more permissive access control policies than the SOC team might design to prioritize risk reduction.
At the same time, SOC teams may need to use administrative accounts outside of their regular responsibilities when remediating security incidents. Without clearly documented incident response plans and policies granting access for automatic remediation, SOC teams can face slower response times.
3. Siloed technologies and processes. Remember the point about ignoring false patterns? It’s important that threat analytics capabilities in privileged access management (PAM) or Identity as a Service (IDaaS) solutions integrate with the tools SOC teams already rely on. Key examples include security information event management (SIEM) and extended detection and response (XDR) solutions. Without the full data that these integrations provide, SOC teams may not be able to see the full picture and could identify false positives.
Even worse, without proper data correlation to generate alerts, Identity Security solutions might not allow SOC teams to see the signal in the noise. Without full context, SOC teams might miss valid patterns that could indicate compromise. For example, an organization with siloed IDaaS and PAM analytics may be able to detect individual low-risk actions like an administrator entering a low-risk command in a privileged session or accessing a web app from an irregular location. In combination, these “low-risk” events may be a strong case for a closer look. But with siloed analytics, SOC and Identity Security teams may not spot the valid pattern.
Threat detection capabilities are only as effective as the data they can analyze. If Identity Security and SOC technologies are not integrated for multi-directional data sharing, SOC teams may face a high number of false positives or worse – a low number of threats detected.
How Can Identity Security Intelligence Streamline Security Ops?
Security is a team game. As with any other security challenge, solving this gap in identity threat detection and prevention requires a combination of people, processes and technology. Here are some recommendations:
1. Document and automate processes for responding to identity-centric attacks. Documented plans in incident response scenarios provide a standardized playbook to help ensure alignment and accountability between SOC and Identity Security teams. And in many cases, documented incident response plans can also help satisfy cyber insurance, audit and compliance requirements.
As a best practice, building clear plans for responding to different types of security incidents (e.g., dedicated actions for remediating a phishing attack) can also streamline response processes, helping minimize the business disruption of security incidents.
2. Centralize threat detection across all user access. Multi-contextual analysis of user access can provide SOC and Identity Security teams with a complete picture of a potential security incident. This data correlation can help accelerate detection and response.
For example, Identity Security Intelligence, a shared service of the CyberArk Identity Security Platform, analyzes a user’s access to web applications and privileged accounts to detect and remediate in-progress attacks. Identity Security Intelligence centrally gathers user behavior analytics data such as login date and time, login location and actions performed by privileged accounts. The service then detects and sends alerts regarding behavior that departs from a user’s behavioral baseline access patterns to web apps and IT infrastructure. The CyberArk Identity Security Platform analyzes a user’s access to web applications and privileged accounts to detect and remediate in-progress attacks. Identity Security Intelligence centrally gathers user behavior analytics data such as login date and time, login location and actions performed of privileged accounts. The service then detects and sends alerts regarding behavior that departs from a user’s behavioral baseline access patterns to web apps and IT infrastructure.
Multi-contextual user behavior analytics in Identity Security Intelligence
Armed with sharper, multi-contextual insight, SOC and Identity Security teams can identify and respond to combinations of behavior that may signal identity compromise, such as an irregular login time, and then entry of specific commands in a remote session to a corporate server.
3. Integrate Identity Security and SOC Team tools. Identity Security teams must arm their SOC teams with the data their solutions naturally detect. Data and alerts from threat analytics services like Identity Security Intelligence can accelerate the SOC team’s ability to detect stolen credentials, insider threats and other identity-centric attacks.
Similarly, SOC teams must configure integrations between their tools and Identity Security solutions to remediate threats. For example, if a SOC team identifies potential abuse of a privileged account used to maintain Windows servers, integration with a PAM solution can automatically suspend or terminate the session. Or in another scenario, if Identity Security Intelligence sends an alert on a risky command entered on a Linux server, security teams can use CyberArk’s identity orchestration capabilities to automatically prevent the employee from using privileged accounts through PAM.
Putting It All Together: The Need for Identity Security Intelligence
Intelligent identity threat detection efforts require a holistic view of user behavior that helps teams spot only the relevant patterns. Identity Security Intelligence can help organizations reduce the risk of identity-centric attacks by eliminating siloes between teams, documenting processes and integrating technologies to rapidly detect and respond to identity-centric threats.
Identity security at inception: A CISO’s guide to proactive protection
Modern enterprises are facing an identity explosion. Fueled by cloud adoption, DevOps acceleration, and now agentic AI, the number of human and machine identities is growing faster than most...
Scattered Spider Unmasked: How an identity-focused APT is redefining cyber threats
Scattered Spider has emerged as one of the most disruptive advanced persistent threats in recent years, breaching major organizations across telecom, gaming, transportation, and retail. In the...
The quantum-AI collision: What CISOs must do now to stay ahead
Technology is moving at the speed of light, and two forces—quantum computing and AI agents—are poised to shake up cybersecurity. We’re not talking about some far-off future; this is happening now....
How agentic AI could transform enterprise workflows: Insights from MIT GenAI Lab
The line between human and machine is blurring—and it’s not a question of whether machines can do more, but how far we’re willing to let them go. The frontier lies in tackling the chaos and...
Machine identity mayhem: The volume, variety, velocity challenge
Machine identities—like the API keys, certificates, and access tokens that secure machine-to-machine connections—are swarming businesses. Yet, many teams still reach for manual tools while their...
Post-quantum cryptography (PQC): how to build resilience while padlocks still work
This blog is the second part of a two-part series on post-quantum cryptography (PQC). In Part 1, we explored how the Harvest Now, Decrypt Later (HNDL) strategy has moved from crypto-conspiracy...
This message will self-decrypt in 5 years: why post-quantum prep starts now
This blog is the first part of a two-part series on post-quantum cryptography (PQC). In this piece, we explore why quantum threats are no longer theoretical. In Part 2, we’ll cover practical steps...
The future of identity governance: fast, secure, and scalable
If the mere mention of identity governance and administration (IGA) stresses you out, you’re in good company. Managing digital identities and access privileges is a significant challenge that only...
“The modern ‘software as a service’ (SaaS) delivery model is quietly enabling cyber attackers and—as its adoption grows—is creating a substantial vulnerability that is weakening the global...
TLS action lead time is closing: 5 practical steps to prepare for 47-day TLS certificates
Have you ever been on a tight deadline, and suddenly, your organization’s core services go dark because a TLS certificate expired without warning? It’s a nightmare scenario no team wants to face....
Federal IT Modernization: Balancing Efficiency with Advanced Cybersecurity
As 2025 unfolds, U.S. federal agencies are navigating significant operational shifts that are impacting their overarching cybersecurity strategies. Government security leaders have always...
How Poor User Experience (UX) Can Undermine Your Enterprise Security
For years, cybersecurity has been chasing a future where passwords no longer exist. And yet, here we are in 2025—still resetting them, reusing them and getting breached because of them. The...
Precision in Machine Identity: Securing the NHIs That Matter
Imagine walking into your next board meeting and saying, “We need to secure all the non-humans.” You can probably picture the reactions: furrowed brows, confused glances—not exactly a solid...
Unlocking ROI: Proving the Value of Your Identity Security Program to the C-Suite
Cybersecurity is no longer just a technical concern; it’s a business-critical investment. Yet, gaining the C-suite’s backing often hinges on one essential question: “What’s the ROI?” Proving the...
Whole-of-State Cybersecurity: A Unified Approach to Protecting Government
In today’s era, where the digital landscape is as critical as the physical, the urgency to adapt and reinforce our cybersecurity infrastructure is more pressing than ever. For government...
TLS Certificate Validity Cut to 47 Days: What You Need to Know
The CA/Browser Forum’s recent unanimous vote to reduce maximum public TLS certificate validity to just 47 days by March 2029 marks a seismic shift in the digital security landscape. This new...
The Cybersecurity Investment Most Organizations Are Failing to Secure
Welcome to the 2025 Identity Security Landscape rollout—and to the “it’s complicated” phase of our relationship with AI. Each year, CyberArk surveys security leaders across the globe to understand...
Linux servers have become widely adopted across organizations of all sizes. However, the frustrations of integrating these servers have left organizations struggling to implement strong security...
Twenty-five years ago, we set out to tackle one of the most challenging problems in identity security: Securing privileged access. Today, CyberArk takes another giant step forward, extending our...
When an electrician comes to fix something in your house, you wouldn’t just hand over the keys and leave. Instead, you’d stay to supervise and ensure everything is done correctly. Similarly,...